At the Bureau County Historical Society, we are committed to providing accurate, well-researched, and thoughtfully presented content on astrology, history, and symbolic interpretation. While astrology is not a hard science, our editorial standards reflect a serious approach to information integrity — blending historical rigor with interpretive insight.
We recognize the importance of maintaining trust with our readers, and our Fact-Checking Policy ensures that the information we present is clear, credible, and responsibly sourced.
1. Fact-Checking Process
Sources Used
We verify information using reputable and clearly documented sources, including:
- Primary sources: Original historical documents, classical astrological texts, ephemerides.
- Peer-reviewed studies: Especially when discussing astrology’s intersection with psychology, culture, or science.
- Official data: From astronomical organizations, academic institutions, and cultural archives.
- Expert interviews: With certified astrologers, historians, and interdisciplinary researchers.
Cross-Verification
To reduce the risk of error or bias, all factual claims must be corroborated by at least two independent, reputable sources. We aim to avoid reliance on single, unverified interpretations.
Documentation
We maintain internal documentation of all sources consulted during the editorial process. This includes:
- The origin and publication date of each source
- Notes on relevance and reliability
- Rationale for inclusion in the final content
Review System
Before publication, all content is reviewed by an editor or peer with relevant subject knowledge. Claims of historical, symbolic, or astronomical significance are flagged for additional scrutiny during this stage.
2. Use of Experts
For complex or nuanced topics, we consult recognized experts in astrology, history, astronomy, psychology, and cultural studies. Expert input may be gathered through interviews, written contributions, or consultations.
Expert Vetting
We assess expertise based on:
- Professional credentials (e.g., certified astrologers, published scholars)
- Demonstrated experience in the relevant field
- Academic or professional affiliations
We also screen for conflicts of interest, including commercial ties, personal bias, or affiliations that could compromise impartiality.
3. Corrections and Updates
Corrections
If factual inaccuracies are identified, we take the following steps:
- Clearly indicate corrections with a note and timestamp
- Update the content to reflect the accurate information
- Include a brief explanation if the correction alters the context or interpretation
Retractions and Major Updates
Content may be retracted or significantly revised if:
- New evidence disproves a major claim
- The original source is discredited
- The integrity of the content is compromised
Major updates will be accompanied by an editor’s note detailing the change.
4. Transparency
We are committed to full transparency in our fact-checking methods and sourcing.
- When applicable, we disclose the methodology behind how interpretations or historical references were derived.
- All non-original claims are attributed clearly, with links or citations to the original sources.
- If we introduce a rating system in the future (e.g., “True,” “Partially Supported,” “Unverified”), the criteria for those ratings will be publicly documented.
5. Independence and Impartiality
Our editorial and fact-checking decisions are made independently of sponsors, advertisers, or external organizations. We do not publish content for promotional purposes unless clearly labeled as such.
To maintain objectivity:
- Editors and contributors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest
- We avoid coverage that is influenced by ideological, political, or financial pressure
- Our guiding principle is clarity, curiosity, and the respectful pursuit of knowledge
We understand that astrology often lives in the space between myth and meaning — but that’s no excuse for misinformation. Our goal is to offer content that invites exploration without compromising on integrity.
If you notice something that doesn’t seem accurate or have questions about our sourcing, we welcome your input. Please reach out via our Contact page.